Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
GMS15 modified composites were found relatively more porous.
However, the mechanical properties of modified composites were improved significantly.
Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of fluoride on NTP modified composites were investigated.
Water absorption capacities of the modified composites were smaller than neat albumen composite.
The strain capacity values for FAC modified composites were higher than the GMS15 and GMS38 incorporated composites due to the better bonding of FACs and fibers with the binder matrix.
However, neither these problems would occur when the modified composites were located under static condition at constant temperature (room temperature) for moisture adsorption, even though the dynamic adsorption tests were proceed in this paper to investigate its adsorption properties.
Similar(53)
These values indicate that the fluoride adsorption on NTP modified composites was improved.
Gas transport through these modified composites is examined as a function of temperature to 300°C.
Ultimate compressive residual strength of the modified composites was, for the different impact energy levels, 23 33% lower as compared to unmodified composites.
The experimental parameters including accumulation time, pH value of buffer solution, and the volume of modified composite were optimized.
The electrochemical performance of the newly modified composite was studied by using Cyclic voltammetry (CV), Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), Square wave voltammetry (SWV).
Related(20)
modified complexes were
modified mixes were
modified mixtures were
modified compounds were
modified nanoparticles were
modified UCNPs were
modified instruments were
change composites were
modified binders were
modified samples were
modified sensors were
modified dyes were
modified bitumen were
modified nanotubes were
modified fibers were
modified crops were
modified histones were
modified males were
modified WPs were
modified suspensions were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com