Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
In the DNA modified by lawsone the intensity of the band at 670 cm−1 increased more than the intensity of the band near 683 cm−1.
From the difference Raman spectrum of DNA modified by lawsone it is clear that there are changes in the areas near 670 cm−1 and near 683 cm−1).
In DNA modified by lawsone the band at 1577 cm−1 increased its intensity by more than 18% than in the case of DNA modified by 1,4-naphthoquinone and binaphthoquinone.
The band at 1343 cm−1 is slightly shifted in DNA modified by lawsone comparing to native DNA and it corresponds to the vibrations of adenine, guanine, and thymine.
We also identified changes in the spectra of DNA modified by lawsone near 807 cm−1, which also indicates changes from B-conformation (834 cm−1) in the A-conformation (807 cm−1) and this change coincides with an increase in the intensity of band at 670 cm−1.
Similar(55)
The significant increase in this peak was observed also for DNA modified by binaphthoquinone and lawsone.
The intensity of the LD signal of DNA modified by binaphthoquinone and lawsone had been decreased in the area of 260 nm.
The band near 1376 cm−1 is linked in the case of DNA modified by binaphthoquinone, juglone, lawsone, and plumbagin with the contribution of these complexes measured in the solid phase.
The largest intercalation mode of naphthoquinone to DNA is observed in the case of DNA modified by binaphthoquinone and lawsone, where the decrease of LD band at 260 nm is the most significant and the molecule of DNA by this modification is the most rigid.
In the spectrum of modified DNA by 1,4-naphthoquinone and plumbagin, this band is slightly lower than in the comparison in the spectrum of the DNA modified by binaphthoquinone, juglone, and lawsone which is in good agreement with the data above-mentioned.
By contrast, the intensity increased less for DNA modified by 1,4-naphthoquinone, juglone, and lawsone The band at 834 cm−1 is located in the area of 800 1000 cm−1.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com