Sentence examples for modifications that supported from inspiring English sources

A complete sequencing of futA and futB in five of the subisolates from the persistently infected patient (67:18, 67:19, 67:20, 67:21 and 67:27) revealed genetic modifications that supported the concept that a large number of additional homologous recombination events had occurred between the two genes (Figure S2).

In this scenario, lysine acetylation may function as an 'auxiliary modification' that supports the relatively weak interaction of 14-3-3ζ 14-3-3ζ 14-3-3ζ

During tumour development, the extracellular matrix suffers modifications that will support malignant progression.

Moreover, there is only weak evidence that mindfulness meditation and MBSR promote sleep [ 54, 55], leading Britton et al. to argue that the Buddhist term awakening "…is not a metaphor, but rather an iterative process of neuroplastic modifications and increased efficiency that supports a new level of perceptual sensitivity and insight" [ 7].

Within such tumour tissue, molecular alterations are considered to be somatically inherited by genetic, epigenetic (traits that are not dependent on the primary sequence of DNA) or extragenetic (post-translational protein modifications that initiate and support positive feedback loops) transmission processes [ 1], leading to a cooperation of neoplastic cells [ 4].

To allow bridging, additional information should be included under each core element of consent as described in Table 2 (Proposed Modifications that Enable Bridging Consent) to support data sharing and unspecified secondary uses of the data, the samples and the research results.

As synthetic molecules, aptamers readily support site-specific modifications that maintain structure and activity.

Given that anaerobic forms of mitochondria are widespread throughout the eukaryotic world, we see eukaryotes in anaerobic habitats as evidence for evolution in the Darwinian sense of descent with modification, with the traits that support survival in anaerobic environments having been conserved from earlier phases of Earth's history.

The Supreme Court did not rule on whether land that needs modifications to support a protected species, like the property in question, can constitute habitat, meaning the ruling may be limited in its impact on other similar cases.

It was found that the Mueller et al. five-step mechanism, with some modifications, best supported the spontaneous ignition and continuous stirred reactor combustion.

However, the Review's terms of reference did not allow major changes to the ECFP and all four afforestation/reforestation schemes, with modifications, were supported for continuation.