Sentence examples for modifications in contrast to from inspiring English sources

Amino acid sequence of mouse WAPs does not highlight any potential site for post-translational modifications, in contrast to pig WAP which, from molecular weight considerations, appears to be glycosylated [ 19].

For example 24 nt siRNAs are involved in transcriptional gene silencing by modulating DNA and histone modifications, in contrast to 21 nt siRNAs and miRNAs that regulate their targets via mRNA degradation and translational repression [ 66].

Another advantage of genome shuffling is that this method is not considered to be genetic modification, in contrast to methods such as protoplast fusion.

When fertilized eggs were microinjected with TALEN mRNAs fused to the DS-3′, their sperm and oocytes had a high rate (84 100%) of target-gene modification in contrast to the lower rate (0 45%) of nucleotide alteration observed in somatic cells.

Separate biological functions used by infected co-cultured MAC-T cells included protein folding and post-translational modification in contrast to infected MAC-T cells alone which contained cell death function.

Importantly, human HGMS applications require special design modifications as, in contrast to conventional use where magnetic elements are permanently imbedded within the separation chambers, medical separators need to avoid direct contact between the magnetic materials and blood to reduce the risk of blood clotting and to facilitate convenient and safe treatment access for many individuals.

When genes are involved in multiple pathways or active in several organs and developmental stages CRE modifications are favored in contrast to mutations in coding regions, due to the lack of detrimental pleiotropic effects.

For example K244 is also surface exposed and minimal modification was observed in contrast to the nearby K242.

These unique modifications include H4 K20 acetylation (in contrast to H4 K20 methylation in non-plant systems), H2B K11 K27, K27 and K32 acetylation, S15 phosphorylation and K143 ubiquitination, and H2A K144 acetylation and S129, S141 and S145 phosphorylation, and H2A.X S138 phosphorylation.

As a consequence, it is not fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the number of edge modifications k unless P=NP (in contrast to SPLIT CLUSTER EDITING).

We assume that the low sample size could be one of the main reasons why significant differences between the surface modifications were not found in contrast to previous evaluations [ 8].