Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Interestingly tyrosine phosphorylation of these peptides was attenuated in the presence of O-GlcNAc modification in comparison to non-glycosylated control peptides (Fig. 2B).
Similar(59)
Q-PCR results were given in fold change, based on the individual gene expression modifications in comparison to the respective control of the experimental group.
This study includes a number of modifications in comparison to the previously published analysis.
With both tests the aim of the former modifications (in comparison to the minimal version) is to get information about preference intensity while the latter modification is intended "to give a sign to neutrality" (see below).
The N-terminal pyroGlu-3 and pyroGlu-11 modifications in comparison to their non-pyroglutaminylated counterparts Glu-3 and Glu-11 or Asp-1 (only Aβx 40 was investigated), revealed a decrease of solubility in the physiological pH range which was accompanied by an increase in hydrophobicity [ 87].
First, chromosomal deletions preclude easy modification of genes in comparison to plasmid-based expression.
Presence of phosphate at tyrosine residues (Tyr114 and Tyr259) significantly enhanced the O-GlcNAc modification of both peptides in comparison to non-phosphorylated control peptides (Fig. 2B).
The latter treatments induced also a higher root growth and a modification of the root architecture in comparison to both control and mineral fertilizer.
Moreover, it can be suggested that the modification of robustness test procedure in comparison to the methodology presented by Nagy-Turák and Ferenczi-Fodor et al. [ 35, 37] and to our previous investigations [ 39– 43] is suitable for robustness study of TLC-densitometric method used in acetaminophen determination in combined pharmaceutical dosage form.
Modifications in the character matrix in comparison to Zrzavy et al (2009) are in bold.
Therapists reported few treatment modifications and hardly any difficulties in comparison to other TF-CBT cases.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com