Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
There was a modest significant correlation between L36 and At36 (r =.28, p <.001).
Calculation of Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a modest significant correlation between MPR and early diastolic strain rate (r = −0.310, P = 0.01) and LV torsion (r = −0.306, P = 0.01).
This ratio varied widely among the genes (fig. 1) and there was only a modest significant correlation between d N/d S on the S. aethnensis and S. chrysanthemifolius branches (Spearman's rank: rs = 0.241, P = 2.0 × 10−21).
While the absence of correlations could be confirmed in wDah (rS = 0.04) and no correlation was found in the Canton S strain either (rS = 0.024), a modest, significant correlation was found in the w1118 strain (rS = −0.36, P-value < 0.001).
Similar(56)
When low, moderate and high PAQ categories were compared with objective PA measures using Spearman's rank correlation, modest significant correlations were found for M5 (0.10–0.32) and ΔM5L5 (0.09–0.33).
BDS is not consistently correlated with GC content, substitution density, or conservation, although specific species do show modest significant correlations with some of these variables.
Plasma Hcy showed a modest and significant correlation with BDI scores (r = 0.21) that was independent from age, B12 and folate levels.
The PADS had a modest but significant correlation with Eysenck's impulsivity scale (r=.28) and was uncorrelated with Eysenck's venturesomeness scale, (r=.00).
There was a modest but significant correlation between baseline L-arginine: ADMA ratio and NO-dependent microvascular reactivity as measured by RH-PAT (figures 1a and 1b) both on univariate analysis (r = 0.34, R2 = 0.12, p = 0.02), and in a multivariate linear regression model adjusting for serum creatinine (Wald p-value for L-arginine: ADMA ratio = 0.03).
There was a modest but significant correlation between FRS and mmIMT, baPWV and CACS (all P < 0.01).
There was a modest, but significant, correlation between the log(s) and the OSI (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.498, p = 0.026).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com