Sentence examples for modest scientific from inspiring English sources

A modest scientific observation about a few drowning polar bears has enmeshed a government wildlife biologist in an investigation into whether he is guilty of scientific misconduct.

For more modest scientific goals, on a par with the capabilities of conventional high SNR spaceborne altimeters, significantly more compact and power efficient instruments can be constructed through the use of photon-counting techniques.

I have to say, for a lot of the things I cover in the book, I honestly believe this stuff has been protected from public scrutiny for many years by a wall of tedium, or if you like, by a wall of modest scientific complexity.

Kircher would no doubt be dissatisfied by the more modest scientific achievements contemporary scholars have granted him, like the assessment that his mammoth study "Underground World" (which, among other things, identified the location of Atlantis) showed that he "understood erosion" and the practical uses of sand, as one writer quoted by Mr. Glassie puts it.

Even for subjects that result in a modest scientific output and are experiencing a diminishing interest, such as BSE, the interested scientist is still faced with 13 papers in the month January of 2009.

With modest scientific evidence of their ROI on health care expenditures [ 29], wellness programs appear to have moved into the employer spotlight that depression enjoyed in the mid 2000's when the current intervention trial was planned.

A scenario analysis of future supply of critical metals is a more modest and scientific approach than a prediction; it enables researchers and policy makers to study the consequences of future economic development on metal reserves and possible futures and supply shortages in different regions.

It is easy to understand why the results of a modest-size scientific study in South Africa were met with ecstatic applause on Tuesday at an international AIDS conference in Vienna.

Crucially, the modest amount of scientific research that exists should not be overinterpreted to back up pre-existing positions.

Whatever you think of their position on global warming, some of them have remarkable statistical skills and have made contributions, generally modest, to the scientific literature.

I wonder, and this is just a modest proposal, if scientific truth should be identified in a way that acknowledges that it's something we know and understand for now – and in a certain way.