modest accuracy for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "modest accuracy for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the level of precision or correctness in a particular context, often implying that the accuracy is acceptable but not high. Example: "The model provides modest accuracy for predicting weather patterns, which is sufficient for general forecasts."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

However, the overall accuracy of the tests was higher in the urine group AUC = 0.94, and Q* = 0.88 than in the saliva with AUC = 0.85, and Q* = 0.78 indicating a modest accuracy for the latter (Data not shown).

Plosone

Inpatient payments can be estimated with modest accuracy for community hospital stays funded by Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

A meta-analysis of the MMSE concluded that this test has modest accuracy, and is most appropriate for ruling out dementia in a primary care setting.

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

On reviewing the evidence base for ventilator weaning [ 7], none of the predictors of weaning demonstrate more than modest accuracy in predicting the weaning outcome.

Critical Care

However, these efforts only achieved modest accuracy with limited biological interpretation.

BMC Genomics

The FRS only had a modest accuracy in prediction of atherosclerotic events in our study.

Cardiovascular Diabetology

Patients with ARDS were discriminated from patients pneumonia and CPE with modest accuracy.

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

It is essential to improve on the modest accuracy rates of EUS imaging alone.

Cancer Imaging

Neutrophil counts produced an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI,.54 .90, P =.03), indicating modest discriminatory accuracy for TBM-IRIS.

Clinical Infectious Diseases

Even predictions with modest accuracies are helpful because they restrict the positions to be examined.

Plosone

This revealed a modest decrease in speed and accuracy for crossmodal matching, consistent with previous findings of a cost of transfer across modalities (e.g. [3], [21]).

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "modest accuracy for", ensure the context clarifies what level of accuracy is considered acceptable or sufficient for the specific application or analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "modest accuracy for" when the actual accuracy is significantly low or unreliable, as this could mislead the audience about the validity of the results or predictions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "modest accuracy for" functions as a descriptive qualifier, specifying the extent to which something is accurate or precise. It is commonly used to acknowledge limitations in the accuracy of a measurement, prediction, or assessment. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through real-world examples.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "modest accuracy for" is a qualifier indicating a limited but potentially acceptable level of precision or correctness. Ludwig's analysis, supported by real-world examples, confirms that it is used to set realistic expectations and provide objective assessments. While grammatically correct and usable, it's essential to ensure the context aligns with the degree of accuracy being described. The phrase appears more frequently in scientific and technical contexts, maintaining a neutral tone. Using alternatives like ""limited accuracy for"" or ""reasonable accuracy for"" can provide nuanced variations while maintaining clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limited accuracy for

Replaces "modest" with "limited", emphasizing the restricted nature of the accuracy.

reasonable accuracy for

Substitutes "modest" with "reasonable", suggesting an acceptable level of accuracy.

acceptable accuracy for

Replaces "modest" with "acceptable", indicating the accuracy meets minimum requirements.

moderate accuracy for

Uses "moderate" instead of "modest", conveying a similar degree of accuracy that is neither high nor low.

limited precision for

Changes "accuracy" to "precision", focusing on the exactness of the measurements or predictions.

fair accuracy for

Replaces "modest" with "fair", indicating a somewhat satisfactory level of correctness.

adequate accuracy for

Substitutes "modest" with "adequate", suggesting the accuracy is sufficient for a specific purpose.

slight accuracy for

Replaces "modest" with "slight", emphasizing the small amount of accuracy.

basic accuracy for

Changes "modest" to "basic", indicating a rudimentary level of accuracy.

marginal accuracy for

Replaces "modest" with "marginal", highlighting the barely sufficient nature of the accuracy.

FAQs

What does "modest accuracy for" imply?

The phrase "modest accuracy for" suggests that the level of correctness or precision is limited but may still be acceptable or useful depending on the specific context or requirements.

What are some alternatives to "modest accuracy for"?

You can use alternatives such as "limited accuracy for", "reasonable accuracy for", or "acceptable accuracy for" to convey a similar meaning while varying your word choice.

In what situations is "modest accuracy for" an appropriate description?

"Modest accuracy for" is appropriate when the results are not highly precise but still provide some value, such as preliminary assessments or broad estimations where high precision is not critical.

How does "modest accuracy for" compare to "high accuracy for"?

While "modest accuracy for" indicates a limited degree of correctness, "high accuracy for" implies a much greater level of precision and reliability. The choice between them depends on the actual performance and intended use of the results.