Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
At the age of eight, 5% of girls and 3% of boys in the study were dissatisfied with their body, which rose with age until, at 14, 32.3% of girls and 16% of boys were "moderately dissatisfied" with at least part of it.
Use this scale: 7: Very satisfied; 6: Moderately satisfied; 5: Slightly satisfied; 4: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 3: Slightly dissatisfied; 2: Moderately dissatisfied; 1: Very dissatisfied.
Mid-range percentages were as follows: "moderately dissatisfied" (2.5%); "slightly dissatisfied" (20%); "neutral" (22.5%); and "moderately satisfied" (15%).
The responses were dichotomised into very satisfied and less satisfied (=moderately satisfied, neutral, moderately dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied) [ 20].
The present study focused on the group of very satisfied patients, which was compared with all the other groups (i.e. moderately satisfied, neutral, moderately dissatisfied, very dissatisfied).
Values are presented as median (minimum; maximum), unless otherwise indicated *Less satisfied = patients who were moderately satisfied, neutral, moderately dissatisfied or very dissatisfied.
Similar(51)
Job satisfaction was assessed by the question, ' How satisfied are you with your job?' with response options on a Likert-type scale: very satisfied, satisfied, moderately satisfied, dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied.
Response scale: Very satisfied; Satisfied; Somewhat satisfied; Neutral (neither satisfied nor dissatisfied); Somewhat dissatisfied; Dissatisfied; Very dissatisfied Q5.
The responses were grouped further into three levels: satisfied (very satisfied and satisfied), moderately satisfied, or dissatisfied (dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied).
Overall 54% were highly satisfied with services, 33% moderately satisfied and 13% dissatisfied.
Approximately half were moderately satisfied with their job (53.4%), 20.5% were dissatisfied, and 26.1% were satisfied.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com