Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Additionally, previous reports included older patients with only mild or moderate visual field loss.
Subjects included in the present study showed moderate visual field impairment due to glaucoma (MD = −11 dB).
In our study, most glaucomatous eyes had mild to moderate visual field defects, according to the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson score [ 38].
In a previous DS study that included 40 patients with glaucoma with mild to moderate visual field damage, Szlyk et al 22 found an association between the number of collisions in a DS and the extent of peripheral visual field loss.
Similar(56)
14 20 Reduced LGN size in glaucoma using readily available 1.5-Tesla MRI provides in vivo evidence of LGN atrophy in glaucoma patients with moderate visual-field loss.
3– 6 Thus, findings in this in vivo neuroimaging study of glaucoma patients with moderate visual-field loss demonstrating LGN atrophy are in keeping with histological studies showing reduced size and neural degeneration in experimental and human glaucoma.
Greaney et al. compared the ability of qualitative assessment by glaucoma specialists of optic nerve head stereophotographs, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO), scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and OCT to distinguish normal eyes from those with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field defects.
According to Nelson's glaucoma staging system, patients were stratified as mild, moderate, and severe visual field loss (VFL).
This decision was based on the criteria for sight impairment to include BCVA of 6/24 with moderate contraction of visual field, media opacities or aphakia.
In a subsequent study in patients with visual impairment or moderate to severe visual field loss, only 39% were able to instill a single drop without touching the eye; age (<70 vs ≥70 years) was found to be a significant predictor for less successful instillation [ 4].
In addition, argon-laser photocoagulation is associated with moderate visual loss, some diminished visual field, reduced color vision, and reduced contrast sensitivity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com