Suggestions(5)
Exact(4)
Contrary to our expectations, we found that both low and moderate stocking rates failed to maintain landscape diversity.
We concluded that light to moderate stocking rates are compatible to sustainable grazing of burned sagebrush steppe rangelands.
It is important to keep in mind that our results have emerged from a moderate to high productivity landscape where livestock (mostly cattle) are kept at moderate stocking rates.
As observed for livestock exclusion, low to moderate stocking rates promote retraction and, finally, elimination of short grazing lawns and their replacement by tall tussock grasslands, or possibly by woody vegetation.
Similar(56)
Grazing regimes with a moderate stocking rate or flexible management strategies were better able to buffer the effects of climate variability.
Within each set of 4 pastures, one of the following grazing treatments was randomly assigned each pasture: rotationally stocked (8 paddocks) at a low, medium, or high stocking rate and continuously stocked at a moderate stocking rate.
Stocking-method treatments were similar in forage allowance in the early- and late-spring periods (P = 0.67 and P = 0.65, respectively), but in the summer period, rotationally stocking at a medium stocking rate was greater (P < 0.01) than continuously stocking at a moderate stocking rate.
There was a consistent trend across seasons for the percent CP in the simulated bite sample DM to be greater (P < 0.1) for the continuously stocking at a moderate stocking rate compared with the rotationally stocking at a medium stocking rate stocking methods.
We hypothesized that low or moderate livestock stocking rates, instead of the high stocking rates currently used for commercial production, might mimic pre-hispanic herbivore pressures.
Significantly lower soil quality was found around the CPs with moderate and high stocking rates than in the pasture and the control area, where grazing was excluded.
Projected population growth was then evaluated for five land-use types (nature reserves, rocky outcrops, plains, fields, and villages) under three levels of livestock (none, moderate and high stocking rates).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com