Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
SF-36 is reliable and has moderate responsiveness for evaluating patients with CSM, with MCID at 5.52 for the PCS and at 3.43 for the MCS.
These findings have implications for the design of meaningful clinical trials, as sections that showed moderate responsiveness (for example, the SF-36 bodily pain) require a relatively lower sample size as compared with sections that demonstrated lower responsiveness (for example, the SF-36 physical function), which require larger sample sizes.
Similar(58)
As a point of reference, an effect size of 0.5 indicates moderate responsiveness of a given HRQOL instrument.
And thus it is unsure if, for instance, the moderate responsiveness the MFPDI holds for populations with other kinds of foot pain as well.
There are multiple possible explanations for the moderate responsiveness.
Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; FU, follow-up; SD, standard deviation Our measure of total effect size was 0.53, indicating that the PedsQL™ demonstrates moderate responsiveness to change in health status for our study population.
This PBA-based formulation showed moderate responsiveness at a relatively high glucose concentration, which could be limited for in vivo studies.
This study indicates that the use of the MFPDI as a longitudinal instrument might be problematic for measuring change in musculoskeletal foot pain due to moderate responsiveness.
Moderate responsiveness was demonstrated among physical and psychosocial functioning; however, the effect size was poor for school function (Table 3).
The QLICD-CHD has good validity, reliability, and moderate responsiveness and some highlights, and can be used as the quality of life instrument for patients with CHD.
Considering the whole CMT group, several parameters showed moderate responsiveness; subgrouping subjects according to disease severity allowed reaching high responsiveness (SRM >0.80).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com