Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Correlation coefficients of 0.1 to 0.3 were considered to indicate a weak relationship, 0.3 to 0.5 a moderate relationship and > 0.5 a strong relationship.
Interpretation of correlation coefficients was as follows: r ≤ 0.49, weak relationship; 0.50 ≤ r ≤ 0.74, moderate relationship; and r ≥ 0.75, strong relationship [ 29].
Correlations ranging from 0.00 to 0.25 indicated a poor relationship; those from 0.26 to 0.50 indicated a fair relationship; values of 0.51 to 0.75 indicated a moderate relationship; and values above 0.76 indicated a good relationship [ 35].
Absolute value of correlation coefficient (r) from 0 to 0.25, ≥0.25 and <0.5, ≥0.5 and <0.75, and ≥0.75 was considered little or no relationship, a fair degree of relationship, a good or moderate relationship, and a very good to excellent relationship, respectively.
Similar(56)
In the captive populations, the birds also had strong associations with one or two other individuals, numerous more moderate relationships, and only a few that were weak.
Correlations with r > 0.30 and those with r < 0.50 indicated moderate relationships, and those with r < 0.3 indicated weak relationships (Fitz-Gibbon and Morris 1987).
There were only weak correlations between individual phase durations and a moderate relationship between inspiratory and expiratory EMG amplitudes during coughing.
We investigated the depth discharge relationship at HWC and found a moderate relationship between depth and drip discharge lag (response) times to soil moisture content, but only weak relationships between depth and mean and maximum discharge.
There was a moderate relationship between age and PV for both men and women (Rs = 0.493, P = 0.001 and Rs = 0.484, P < 0.001, respectively).
There is a moderate relationship between control and ZDS (r = 0.57) and women were more likely to be classified as depressed as expected.
Green [ 9, 10] reported a small to moderate relationship between attitudes and achievement in statistics at the post-secondary level.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com