Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
The results also showed that the HIT group's workload (a measurement of strength) improved twice as much compared with the moderate intensity group, which suggests there may be an association between improved fitness and enjoyment.
Also, the HIT group's score increased weekly and peaked by the end, while the moderate intensity group's score stayed stagnant throughout.
Endothelium-dependent forearm vasodilation improved in the moderate intensity group only.
There are several published studies of low to moderate intensity group lifestyle interventions in overweight adolescents [ 35- 37] that are similar enough to compare to this study.
Participants in the moderate intensity group aim to be at 4-6 RPE, and the vigorous group at 7-9 RPE.
Participants in the moderate intensity group are asked to adjust their intensity so that they are between 4-6 on this scale, and the vigorous group are between 7-9.
Similar(52)
For computer determined Ki-67 intensities, no statistically significant difference was observed between low and moderate intensity groups (figure 4b).
After six weeks, the HIT group had a 10% higher overall exercise enjoyment score than the moderate-intensity group.
In fact, the low-intensity group reported less fatigue than the moderate-intensity group.
The moderate-intensity group had the greatest decrease in fasting insulin; however, this difference was not significant (P < 0.19).
Surprisingly, the improvement in DI that occurred in the moderate-intensity group was significantly greater than in both of the vigorous-intensity groups (Fig. 1).
More suggestions(15)
moderate duration group
moderate risk group
moderate advocacy group
moderate intensity exercise
moderate intensity training
moderate probability group
moderate aphasia group
moderate nationalist group
moderate persistent group
moderate hypothermia group
moderate intensity Table
moderate mortality group
moderate outcome group
moderate fit group
moderate intensity level
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com