Suggestions(1)
Exact(11)
Higgins et al. [44] suggest that I2 values of 25% indicate low inconsistency, 50% moderate inconsistency, and 75% high inconsistency among the studies.
I values of 25 50% indicate moderate inconsistency, whereas values > 50% reflect large inconsistencies among studies.
Overall, significant heterogeneity (P = 0.01) and moderate inconsistency (I2 = 54%) were present among the estimates reported by the studies.
We did not find a significant association between naproxen use and AMI, but there was significant heterogeneity and moderate inconsistency among the 12 studies.
Compared with pharmacological medications, moxibustion significantly alleviated overall IBS symptoms but there was a moderate inconsistency among studies (7 RCTs, RR 1.33, 95% CI [1.15, 1.55], I = 46%).
Moxibustion combined with acupuncture was more effective than pharmacological therapy but a moderate inconsistency among studies was found (4 RCTs, RR 1.24, 95% CI [1.09, 1.41], I = 36%).
Similar(48)
However, we also found moderate implicit inconsistencies between study protocol specifications and published baseline data.
I values of <25%, 50%and>75%5% represent low, moderate and high inconsistency, respectively [ 28].
This represents a moderate level of inconsistency attributable to genuine variation in gene effect size.
20 21 I values of 25% or less, 50%, and 75% or greater represent low, moderate, and high inconsistency.
A moderate to high inconsistency of 61% was found among people with diabetes, but none among people without diabetes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com