Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
These are 0.2 for a small group change, 0.5 for a moderate group change and 0.8 for a large group change.
Similar(59)
Change scores for the mild to moderate group did not significantly differ.
The overall sequence error showed changes during practice particularly for the moderate group, F (1,12) = 19.030, p = 0.009 (Fig. 2).
The mild group was more accurate than the moderate group.
Within the ILI group, changes were moderate (ES>.50 and <.79).
Despite a 9-mmHg difference in SBP between the intensive and the moderate groups, the primary end point (change in creatinine clearance) was the same.
Within the ILI group, changes in the emotional dimension, symptom reduction and symptom distress were moderate.
They reported moderate test – retest reliability (ICC 0.80) and concluded that the TUG test was reliable and valid to assess group changes of patients in orthopaedic rehabilitation wards.
Positive trends were found for parent-reported time at moderate-to-vigorous intensity (between-group change ratio = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.4) and GMFM-66 (mean between-group difference = 2.8 points, 95% CI 0.2 to 5.4) at 6 months, but not at 12 months.
Large to moderate meaningful changes in group scores were observed in all SF-36 subscales except GH across the intervention groups.
Large to moderate meaningful changes in group scores were observed in all SF-36 subscales except General Health across the intervention groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com