Sentence examples for moderate discriminant validity from inspiring English sources
Due to the close relationship between tinnitus and hypersensitivity to sound (common problems with concentration/attention, stress, hearing difficulties, participation), the HQ was predicted to moderately correlate with tinnitus questionnaires, that is, moderate discriminant validity.
Total scores of the BDD-SS showed good reliability and convergent validity and moderate discriminant validity.
Moderate convergent and discriminant validity were found when BFNE-II items were correlated with additional independent measures of social anxiety [i.e., Social Interaction Anxiety & Social Phobia Scales; Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1998).
In terms of convergent and discriminant validity, moderate correlations were observed for all measures suggesting that the HQ is measuring an alternative construct to these measures; in particular, the HQ measures a construct that is different to the sensitivity to loud sounds measured as ULLs.
Included for hypothesis validation (discriminant validity).
Convergent validity agreement was moderate (range for r = 0.55, 0.67) for cluster B disorders rated with DSM-IV criteria, and discriminant validity was moderate for eight of the ten personality disorders.
The correlation analysis demonstrated that all the three dimensions were not perfectly correlated as their correlation analysis illustrated from low to moderate scores, hence establishing the discriminant validity of the measures.
It also has strong discriminant validity and moderate construct validity [ 49].
Regarding discriminant validity, a moderate correlation was found between WHOQOL-AGE and net affect [ r = 0.35; 95% CI = (0.31, 0.38)].
Discriminant validity was moderate for paranoid, antisocial, histrionic, narcissistic, avoidant and obsessive-compulsive disorders (range of comparison violations: 5 29%).
Discriminant validity was moderate for paranoid, schizotypal, dependent and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder and all cluster B disorders (range of comparison violations: 5 21%).
