Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
The IPAQ has a good test-retest reliability (Spearman's ρ = 0.80) and a moderate criterion validity (Spearman's ρ = 0.30) with an accelerometer [ 18].
Whereas the IPAQ-S7S and its separate walking component demonstrated small to moderate (r=0.26 0.4) 41 and moderate criterion validity (r=0.39), 42 respectively.
Ekelund et al. [ 10] indicated moderate criterion validity of the IPAQ instrument and the MTI Actigraph Manufacturing Technologyy Inc., formerly known as The Computer Science and Application, (CSA)) with correlation ranging from 0.16 0.35.
The validity and reliability of IPAQ was tested in 12 countries in 2000 and the results showed that IPAQ has a high reliability and moderate criterion validity, and the study recommended the use of short form of IPAQ for population-based physical activity measurement (13).
Similar(56)
The English Oxford Shoulder Score has a high test-retest reliability, high internal consistency, and a weak-to-moderate criterion validity (Berendes et al. 2010).
There was moderate to large criterion validity between the PFIT-s and the three other functional tests.
Sub-group analysis by sex showed similar moderate correlations for criterion validity for females (r = 0.434; p = 0.010) and males (r = 0.496; p = 0.005) (Table 3).
Daviss et al. found that the summed child and parent MFQ score demonstrated moderate to high criterion validity (.89) for discriminating 7 to 17-year-olds with and without major depressive episodes [ 14].
The Dutch Shoulder Rating Questionnaire has high internal consistency, high test-retest reliability, moderate-to-good criterion validity, and is an appropriate instrument to demonstrate clinical differences (Vermeulen et al. 2005).
Evidence synthesis of the SPS resulted in moderate positive evidence for criterion validity (fair methodological quality and positive findings).
Evidence synthesis of the HLQ resulted in moderate negative evidence for criterion validity because of the fair methodological quality of the studies and negative findings (correlations <0.70).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com