Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(22)
Parameters showing r > 0.7 are considered to be strongly correlated whereas r between 0.4 and 0.7 shows moderate correlation and parameters showing r < 0.4 shows low to no correlation.
Analysis of Pearson correlation revealed coefficients higher than 0.9 for both cell lines (strong correlation) when comparing data from microarray probes 1 and 2, and coefficients between 0.4 and 0.5 for VSa13 cells (moderate correlation) and between 0.5 and 0.8 for VSa16 cells (moderately high correlation) when comparing data from microarray and qPCR.
A Pearson correlation coefficient greater than 0.60 indicated a strong correlation, a coefficient between 0.30 and 0.60 indicated a moderate correlation and a coefficient below 0.30 indicated a low or very low correlation [40].
An r-value of 0.1 to 0.39 was considered a weak correlation, an r-value of 0.4 to 0.6 was considered a moderate correlation, and an r-value of 0.61 to 1.0 was considered a strong correlation.
There was evidence of moderate correlation and concordance among the different composite indicators compared.
We assumed 0.2 < r < 0.4 as a low to modest correlation, 0.4 < r < 0.5 as moderate correlation, and r > 0.5 as highly correlation.
Similar(38)
While interpreting the correlation analysis, we used the categorization in [43], where correlation coefficients (in absolute value) which are ≤0.35 are considered as low or weak correlations, 0.36≤r,ρ≤0.67 modest or moderate correlations, and 0.68≤r,ρ≤1 strong or high correlations.
All subscales had moderate correlations and the total scale had a strong correlation with the Maternity Survey.> -wrap-foot> *Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated using Stata V11.
Thus, minutes of MVPA determined by ICPs and a GCP varied considerably, indicated by low to moderate correlations and CVs of about 50% between the measures.
A strong correlation coefficient was considered to be over 0.6, a moderate correlation, 0.3 0.6, and a weak correlation below 0.3 [ 37].
EC and TDS show high positive correlation with Na+, K+, Cl− and HCO3 – and moderate correlation with Ca2+, Mg2+, SO4 2− and total hardness (TH).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com