Exact(9)
We considered ρ values of 0.60-0.79 to indicate high correlation, values of 0.40-0.59 moderand, and values of 0.20-0.39 weak or low correlations.
In general, values ranging from 0.6 to 1.0 are considered strong correlations, values of 0.4 to 0.6 are considered moderate, and values below 0.4 are considered weak.
Values higher than 0.8 are generally considered to demonstrate good discrimination, values between 0.6 and 0.8 are considered moderate, and values lower than 0.6 are considered poor.
Values of r≤0.25 were considered low, values of 0.25 < r≤ 0.50 were considered moderate and values of r≥0.75 were considered high [ 19].
To assess single monotonicity, we estimated Loevinger coefficients for each item (H i) and for the whole scale (H), where values between 0.3 and 0.4 suggest weak scalability, values between 0.4 and 0.5 moderate, and values above 0.5 strong scalability.
Benchmarks to classify the importance of the change are available, with ES values of 0.20 0.49 considered small, values of 0.50 0.79 considered moderate, and values ≥ 0.80 considered large [ 26].
Similar(51)
Prices are moderate and value is outstanding.
Values greater than 0.8 means excellent agreement between methods, values of 0.61 0.8 means substantial agreement, values of 0.41 0.6 means moderate agreement, and values below 0.4 means poor agreement (White et al. 2013).
ICC values between 0.50 and 0.75 indicated moderate reliability and values >0.75 good reliability.
Results below.60 represented poor reliability,.60 to.75 moderate reliability and values above.75 good reliability [ 24].
We defined I values between 30% and 60% as moderate heterogeneity and values >60% as substantial heterogeneity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com