According to the financial blog mintlife, the cost of a 22-foot-long model would average $20,000.
Thus, MotifScan can give better predictions than PWM scanning for factors where a simple PWM model would "average out" the sequence variation in the k-mers bound by the factor.
This means that the cumulative incidence rate in our model would average 6.1% over the analytic horizon in patients in the nsNSAID treatment arm compared with 4.7% in those in the celecoxib treatment arm.
A better model would essentially average the idiosyncratic factors of each president to generate a baseline against which Mr. Obama's approval could be evaluated.
Such model would simply average the past 3 rewards.
Formal comparison between threshold and linear models, based either on the AIC or on the deviance chi-square test, showed that linear models would on average fit better than the threshold ones.
If no particular phase relationship between the grids in each compartment existed, the local and global models would on average fall in the middle of the distribution of the randomly offset grids.
Furthermore, two competing effects in our model would be averaged out in an integral over the Antarctic zone: DIC anomalies contribute to some CO2 uptake along the coast, but they are balanced by an alkalinity effect of the same magnitude, and further north, the DIC effect peaks around 60°S.
Perhaps the kingpins at Samsung thought any more than three models would confuse the average American shopper although most tech pundits assumed the new GalTab 7.7 would replace the very old 7-inch model.
Theoretically, if we suppose that the patients received 100% of the maximum recommended ChEI dose (instead of the mean 65% observed in the SATS), our regression model would on average estimate 43 minutes less HHS per week.
