Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
Nettelmann, N. et al. Uranus evolution models with simple thermal boundary layers.
The authors describe how to build and analyze multistate models with simple assumptions about behavior, and develop a general modeling methodology for the construction of models as playable games.
This finding suggests that models with simple pairwise additive interaction schemes, involving hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding, can mimic the folding of small helical proteins, but that such models are insufficient to produce high degrees of folding cooperativity.
In addition, emphasis has been put on modularity enabling the same model framework to be used both for the more traditional 1D and 2D dispersion models with simple 1D flow calculations, as well as for the more elaborate 2D and 3D reactive flow calculations.
The conclusion follows from symmetry considerations and therefore applies to a wide class of models with simple plane wave solutions.
For studying or forecasting short duration and volume-limited flows (e.g., Etna 1981 or Kīlauea December 1974; Guest et al., 1987; Soule et al., 2004), models with simple rheologies (VolcFlow and MOLASSES) are reasonably accurate and significantly faster than more complex models.
Similar(46)
Nov 16: Can we replace complicated LSTM models with simpler, interpretable models?
Less common is the use of models with simpler geometric assumptions but rigorous evaluations of the thermodynamic properties of the flowing fluid.
We compare these models with simpler models defined on binary phyletic vectors, such as the substitution matrices described by Cohen et al.[ 8].
We compared the full models with simpler nested models by removing a different variance component each time, using Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) to assess the significance of random effects.
Thus, it is possible to compare more complex models with simpler models, for example a model including gender differences in aetiology with one that includes no gender differences, and assess on the grounds of parsimony which is the best-fitting model.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com