Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Twenty-five different calibration models were validated by cross-validation approach with 25 left out standards.
The PM10 model and post-1999 pre-1999 PM2.5modelsodels were validated using cross-validation.
The O-PLS models were validated by sevenfold cross validation.
The final models were validated using the PDB validation server.
The models were validated using the PDB validation server.
DT-based models were validated using the tenfold cross-validation (CV) method [37].
The classification models were validated on a separate cohort (validation cohort; Supplementary Table 1).
Both the PCA and PLS models were validated using the full cross-validation method.
Models were validated using leave-one-out cross-validation.
Within CAESAR the models were validated by both internal and external validation.
The models were validated using 10 × 10 cross-validation.
More suggestions(17)
methodologies were validated
templates were validated
samples were validated
systems were validated
sample were validated
modelling were validated
later were validated
models were gone
models were launched
models were wrong
models were analyzed
models were sent
models were interspersed
models were cut
models were discontinued
models were veiled
models were based
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com