Ai Feedback
Exact(9)
If more than one mixed-effect model showed significant improvement over the standard fixed-effect model, the optimal mixed-effect model was chosen by the likelihood ratio test if models were nested or by the corrected Akaike's information criterion (AICc), otherwise.
All these models were nested.
The likelihood ratio test (LRT) was used to determine model fit when the models were nested in parameters.
If two models were nested models, the more parsimonious model was selected if the χ difference was not significant based on AIC.
Because the two models were nested, we used -2 log likelihood, known as the "change in the deviance", which has a chi-square distribution to test whether the difference between the two models was statistically significant (Table 4).
Models were nested and an improvement in the objective function was referred to the Chi-squared distribution to assess significance e.g. an objective function change (OBJ) of 3.84 is significant at α = 0.05.
Similar(49)
Sequential modelling ensures that the models are nested and can be compared using standard statistical test.> -wrap-foot> NotEstimatedated standard errors in parenthesis.
The subcells' constitutive models are nested through a numerical stress-update algorithm.
The independence (null) models are nested inside the undirected joint and conditional models and contain one less parameter.
This likelihood ratio test requires that the models are nested, i.e., that one model can be defined in terms of the second.
These models are nested, and the differences between the models provides a test of the hypotheses.
Related(20)
models were located
models were embedded
samples were nested
specimens were nested
models were linked
models were hierarchical
models were superior
models were gone
models were launched
models called nested
models were wrong
models were analyzed
models were sent
models were interspersed
models were cut
models were discontinued
models were veiled
models were based
models were trained
models were put
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com