Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(28)
NPMR models were less complex and had higher predictive capability than LR for all modeling approaches.
By comparison, the smaller Optolyth models were less impressive optically but were easier on eyeglass wearers.
However, it should be noted that the new models were less effective at estimating cycle lifetimes for batteries that had undergone greater degradation.
Though much-admired classics now, the '58 models were less appreciated when new, caught short by a styling coup at Chrysler, which was capitalizing on the bold tailfins of its Forward Look cars.
Due to the observed variability in the direction of maximum stiffness, the average Fung models were less anisotropic than the specimen-specific models.
Although these models were affected by nickel contamination, the Cu models were less sensitive to this contamination than the Co and Zn models.
Similar(32)
These two models were less-efficient fliers than real locusts: The curved, twisting wings of real bugs were about 10% more efficient in producing lift than the camberless wings, and they were 50% more efficient than the flat, rigid model.
Some money-for-fruit models are less ambitious.
The models are less successful in predicting grain reorientations.
It's important to note, however, that although other charter school models are less trendy, they do exist.
While some models are less expensive, high-end noise-canceling headphones cost $300 to $400.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com