Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
For amount of tooth movement, models were imaged and analyzed.
In the present study, two kinds of bleeding models were imaged: persistent and temporary bleeding models.
The models were imaged from both sides, resulting in 4 orientations.
The experimental models were imaged by micro-computed tomography (CT), and FEA models were constructed from the CT data.
In vivo subcutaneous glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and cervical cancer mice models were imaged.
Both in vitro and ex vivo models were imaged before and after isoflurane treatment, which is known to slow ciliary activity [ 22].
Similar(54)
In contrast, recruitment of CTLs to tumours in previously published murine models was imaged for example only after 24 hours post-injection of 10 × 10 CTL 8. Also, in a clinical study where DCs were injected intranodally, In-labelled DCs were detected after 3 days and this was correlated with immune activation of T and B cells as these cells were activated and proliferated.
All animals implanted with a magnet and used either for the in vivo imaging experiment or for the efficacy testing in the AIA model were imaged by micro-CT scan in order to assess the magnet location.
At each time point, 1 to 4 TG and WT mice of each model were imaged (Table 1).
Animals of the subcutaneous HCCLM3 model were imaged on days 0, 7, 14, and 21 after treatment.
The two sample teeth from each model were imaged using a 2-D Image Analysis System as described by Brook et al. This consisted of a 32-bit digital camera (Kodak DCS Pro SLR/C with 90 mm Tamron lens) connected to a laptop PC (Pentium® 4 CPU, 3.40 GHz, Dell OPTIPLEX 620).
Related(20)
samples were imaged
models were depicted
systems were imaged
models were represented
specimens were imaged
models were created
later were imaged
sample were imaged
models were representative
models were gone
models were launched
models were analyzed
models were wrong
models were sent
models were interspersed
models were cut
models were discontinued
models were veiled
models were based
models were trained
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com