Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The performances of different models were compared.
The two numerical models were compared.
In this study three different models were compared.
The models were compared using the Deviance Information Criterion.
These models were compared with closed-form solutions.
Four competing models were compared for each instrument.
The in-situ model testing and numerical models were compared.
The adapted nucleation models were compared to the experimental results.
These estimations of the bivariate probit models were compared with the estimations for the univariate probit models and also both bivariate probit models were compared with each other.
The resulting models were compared in terms of correlation and MAE with observed values.
Finally outputs acquired from the ANN models were compared with the experimental results.
More suggestions(17)
templates were compared
choices were compared
ones were compared
specimen were compared
matrices were compared
examples were compared
samples were compared
methodologies were compared
later were compared
modelling were compared
sample were compared
kind were compared
models were gone
models were launched
models were minimized
models were evaluated
models were stratified
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com