Ai Feedback
Exact(13)
The comparison between the two contours seemed to indicate that the fittings based on two models were close.
The MOE predictions based on the ACI and the CEB-FIP models were close to each other; in long-term, they approach the constant AASHTO value.
The rating results obtained from the 2D-grid models were close to 3D-FEM-based evaluation, while simplified 1D bar models had serious shortcomings.
Predictions made using the concentration addition and independent action models were close to the observed joint toxicities regardless of mixture types and mixture ratios.
For any trait, the P values from the three models were close to the expected P value.
Both the scaled deviance and Pearson's chi-square statistic for these models were close to one, indicating an excellent model fit.
Similar(47)
Furthermore, the predictions by both analysed models were closer to reality than the values estimated with the SYMLEK system.
Two antagonist schools [14] and Flory [15], tried to theoretically determine, which models were closer to reality.
The estimates in DYD-YD models were closer to the simulated parameters.
For 53% of all variables considered, the ratings of percent importance in the models were closer for the ANN and CE model than for MLR and CE.
All, except gap models, are close to mono-specific stands modelling approaches.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com