Sentence examples for models were calculated using from inspiring English sources

The homologous models were calculated using the Web-based modeling programs; I-TASSER (red), IntFOLD2 (green), Phyre2 (blue), RaptorX (purple).

Individual nuclide cross-section sensitivities for heterogeneous and homogeneous fuel assembly models were calculated using the multi-group adjoint method, the iterated fission probability (IFP) method, and the Contribution-Linked eigenvalue sensitivity/Uncertainty estimation via Track length importance Characterization (CLUTCH) method.

The errors in case of linear models were calculated using correlation coefficient (R2).

The largest errors of models were calculated using ECFP4, MolPrint and Inductive descriptors, which had a cross-validation RMSE of >50 °C for the training set.

The coefficients of the models were calculated using a standard least squares optimization.

Additive, dominant and recessive models were calculated using linear and logistic regression models for the quantitative and categorized traits respectively.

Equilibrium configurations of different double-layer onion models are calculated using the theorem of stationarity of the total potential energy.

The accuracy of the models was calculated using spatially independent test data by the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plot.

The significance of a difference in C-index between different models was calculated using the method described by Haibe-Kains et al. [12].

Moreover, crustal magnetic models are calculated using only nightside data (e.g., Langlais et al. 2004) to limit the external contamination in magnetic data.

Model discrimination for each of the models was calculated using area under ROC curve.