Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
The difference in wire deflection between the stable and unstable models was significant (p < 0.0001).
Analysis of variance showed that the contribution of quadratic models was significant for the responses.
This warming was accompanied by enhanced cyclonic circulation at the 500 hPa level.The difference in the equivalent potential temperatures between the uncoupled and coupled models at 60 h had a wavenumber-1 asymmetric structure (Figure 12c), indicating that the difference between the tracks simulated using the uncoupled and coupled models was significant.
Only the inclusion of age in the models was significant.
For AGAP005196, none of the comparisons among codon models was significant using PAML.
Note: The F statistic for each of the 3 models was significant at the.05 level.
Similar(46)
All models are significant at α = 0.05.
In this case, none of the personality models were significant.
In the current study, four quadratic models are significant model terms (Table 4).
The lack of fit values for all models was not significant, showing that the fitted models are significant.
The Prob > F values are all less than 0.0001 which herald the models are significant.
More suggestions(14)
specimen was significant
sample was significant
example was significant
later was significant
models remained significant
models was much
models showed significant
models were significant
models was purposeful
models included significant
models revealed significant
models yielded significant
model was significant
models detected significant
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com