Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(51)
The difference between the two models was found to be less than 0.1%.
Margules models was found to be best amongst the studied models.
The coefficient of determination of these two models was found to be 0.980 and 0.967, respectively.
Prediction capability of the proposed models was found to be strong.
None of the models was found suitable for EVA MWCNT composites.
The inconsistency between the results of the models was found to be due to differences between the wind input parameterizations.
Similar(9)
The accuracy of the models were found to be good.
The models are found to be in excellent agreement.
Both models were found to be in good agreement.
Existing CCD debonding models were found to be conservative.
These models were found to be appropriate and significant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com