Fuzzy models use linguistic interpretations to formulate rules and logical connectives in order to make connections between features and the final prediction.
This confirms the presented model as a reliable (binary) classifier for determining the well-testing interpretation models using the pressure derivative plots.
As a result of uncertainty in the uniqueness of existing models used for interpretation, this method has not been widely used to investigate more general transport processes including matrix diffusion or advective solute exchange between mobile and immobile zones of fluid.
In 1899 David Hilbert published a book in which he constructed such models, using exactly the method of interpretation that we have just described.
These results indicate that hydrogeologic conceptual models used in age interpretations might not adequately account for mixing in the EA.
As all amines react with CO2 in a reversible way, and the mass transfer models used for the interpretation of the experimental data neglect this reversibility and take only the forward reaction rate into account, the influence of the reversibility is studied.
In this section, the sensitivities and limitations of the LCA models used are discussed, the interpretation of the results is addressed, and a description is provided of how the LCA results have been used regarding the development of Charter ASPs.
The non-uniqueness problem always brings about confusion in selecting the correct reservoir model using the conventional interpretation approaches.
Theoretical frameworks have been called "the analyst's reading glasses" and are conceptual models used in the process of interpretation (Malterud 2001).
However, these are characterised by uncertainties related to the measurements and the model used for interpretation (e.g. the inadequacy of 1D assumption).
