Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
When reach-level habitat variables were added to the models there was a consistent improvement in model performance and an increase in the number of significant models.
There were vamping models; there was lamé chiffon.
In both models, there was a strong dissociation between nonspecific locomotion and putative exploratory behaviors.
Across the first three models, there was a positive association between having high-educated parents and habituated aspirations.
For the mouse and rat models, there was a small increase in 〈z1〉, while in the human model, 〈z1〉 remained fairly constant with increasing iodine concentration.
For all models, there was no evidence that the effect of individual size on AGR was different in thinned vs. unthinned stands.
For men in all models, there was a negative and significant association between walking 30 min a week or more and triglyceride levels.
In animal models, there was an improvement in bleeding time, but there was no effect on the coagulation assays [9,10].
For these five models there was also little pattern in the residuals when these values were plotted against predicted values or variables included in the final models (data not shown).
In normal- and obstructive-lung, open-mouth models, there was enough time after exhalation and before the beginning of the next inspiration (Fig. 4) to reach the maximum washout effect with an HFNC flow of 10 L/min.
Although 'time from fire' was an insignificant parameter during the testing of models, there was either maintenance of or an overall decrease in native species richness as time from treatment increased.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com