Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
The gamma and Pearson models showed acceptable performances in simulating both limbs of the unit hydrographs.
The response surface modeling of the parameters obtained by the predictive models showed acceptable correlation for mesophiles (R2 = 0.815 0.977) but not for yeasts (R2 = 0.618 0.815).
The study proved that several models showed acceptable discrimination, but no model achieved excellent discrimination.
The five indices used in the first regression models showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach coefficient alphas above the critical value of 0.70 for all indices (Table 4).
An important point that is illustrated by this scatter plot is that each of the reordered Y-matrix models showed acceptable R, even when there was poor Q.
The ROC curve for the risk score models showed acceptable discriminant power with a C-statistic of 0.636 955% CI 0.573 0.698).
Similar(51)
All models show acceptable fits with RMSEA values ranging from.044 to.054, CFI values ranging from.906 to.938 and TLI values ranging from.902 to.920.
Secondly, the derived prediction models show acceptable results regarding the estimation of peak ground motions for shear waves at selected rock sites.
However, only recalibrated ARIC and SAHS models show acceptable calibration quality with H-L statistic of 7.31 and 2.23 respectively.
The model showed acceptable correlation and was used to conduct a thorough parametric study on various design configurations.
In this sense, it was verified that the adjustment indicators with three response options (second model) presented a good fit (χ2/df = 1.56, TLI = 0.94, CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.04) and the model with five response options (first model) showed acceptable but poor fit (χ2/df = 2.92, TLI = 0.87, CFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.07) (Table 1) (Marôco, 2014).
More suggestions(15)
sample showed acceptable
models showed similar
models showed divergent
models showed good
models offered acceptable
models was acceptable
models had acceptable
models showed dynamic
models showed excellent
models gave acceptable
models showed equal
models showed significant
models showed clear
models showed multiple
models were acceptable
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com