Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
For all models, results of these diagnostic tests suggested good model fit (P > 0.05).
Using zero inflated negative binomial models, results of the univariable and multivariable analyses in this subgroup (web appendix 5) showed a trend similar to the larger dataset, but with wider confidence intervals, owing to a reduced sample size.
We performed Shapiro tests on all our explanatory variables, and because all of them were normally distributed, we used a normal error distribution in our models (results of the Shapiro tests: average larval mass W = 0.97, P = 0.22; brood size W = 0.97, P = 0.17; P = 0.46, female lifespan W = 0.96, P = 0.07; male lifespan W = 0.97, P = 0.14).
Whereas researchers will often choose to tailor their own interventions based on theory, conceptual models, results of past intervention studies, and knowledge about complex intervention design approaches [ 2], there is little guidance on how to either structure the inputs of caregiving programs or select measures that optimize evaluation efforts.
Associations between occupational noise exposure dose (continuous noise index), work-related stress, noise annoyance at work and hearing-related symptoms were evaluated in manual sequential binary logistic regression models, results of which are presented in table 3. The calculated noise index ranged from 4.5 to 64 in the study sample.
Similar(55)
Fig. 5 Signal model simulation results of the proposed algorithm.
Model taxonomy of hierarchal linear model results of performance measure outcomes for study 2. Table S13.
Model taxonomy of hierarchal linear model results of pre and post-test data in study 1.
To test performance of the proposed model, results of different sensitivity analysis are reported.
Figures 12, 13, 14 shows model results of proppant settling in a 4 mm-wide fracture.
Table 5 shows the MNL model results of choice experiment data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com