Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Logistic regression models reported a significant association of odds of walking with density of street trees and street-level betweenness (a measure of street network connectivity), while sensitivity analyses with continuous regression models for participants doing some walking indicated beneficial associations of distance walked with NDVI greenness and street trees.
By contrast, previously described models reported a neovascularization prevalence of only 13%, which was not observed until between 36 and 60 weeks of age.
At-risk patients from Capitation models reported a smaller increase in the number of additional clinic visits/year than Fee-For-Service and Salaried models.
The finding that 62% to 67% of pathologists with musculoskeletal problems who switched from a conventional microscope or office chair to ergonomically optimized models reported a relief of their pain further supports this theory.
Indeed, most of the investigations of WBV in adult mouse models reported a positive WBV osteogenic impact in only the tibial trabecular bone [44] with no impact on cortical bone [40,46].
Similar(55)
All these models report a failure rate of 8 15%, which is comparable to the 10% rate of our model.
Our models report a probability of pathogenicity, rather than a categorisation into pathogenic or benign, which captures the inherent uncertainty of the prediction.
Previously described models report a prevalence of only 13% for neovascularization observed at a much later time point, between 36 and 60 weeks of age.
However, clinical and experimental studies in diabetic patients and models report a significantly higher cardiovascular risk and controversial effects on the effect on IR injury [ 26].
The Hosmer Lemeshow goodness-of-fit assessment of the final model reported a p value of 0.90.
Moreover, the DIFS model reported a deficient soil resupply capacity; this agreed with low R values, which were mostly attributed to the limited available pool of Cu in the soil solid phase.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com