Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
The results demonstrate that both models predict similar hillslope form as well as erosion rates over a 1000-year modelled period.
Both models predict similar path loss levels for.
The results reveal that although both linear and nonlinear models predict similar oscillation frequencies, the nonlinear model predicts lower exergetic efficiencies.
All three models predict similar reductions in prevalence for decreases in transmission rate of less than 10% (Fig. 4A).
Despite the differences between these two approaches, both models predict similar outcomes, i.e. that there should be incomplete compensation for a change in partner work-rate for biparental care to be a stable strategy.
The two final models predict similar profiles except for the second's higher peak.
Similar(52)
The DDES (Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation) and LES models predicted similar results in the wake region, but the DDES has a lower overall mesh requirement.
While macro-scale and micro-scale models predicted similar average oxygen levels at different depths within the scaffold, μCT models revealed small local oxygen variations within the scaffold micro-architecture.
The results show that the DGM and Fickian-based models predicted similar dense gas density profiles which matched the measured data well for horizontal transport of dense gas at low to high source densities, despite the pressure variations predicted in the soil column were opposite to the measurements.
Both models predicted similar patterns of change in other economic variables (missed work days, disability rates, and household income).
The 2-strain and 4-strain models predicted similar overall impacts of vaccines on carriage prevalence, especially with respect to the vaccine-targeted serogroups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com