Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Though problems due to some autocorrelation were expected, the linear multivariate models performed quite well.
The five bucket models performed quite differently, which demonstrated the aspect ratio effects and inside-bucket compartment effects.
Figure 7 shows the comparison of different estimated and measured global solar radiation (H) of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and it is evident that all the models performed quite well and give approximately close estimation of solar radiation for Dhaka.
With the help of the ROC curves (Figure 5), it is clear to see that all three models performed quite well for testing data that have high posterior probability.
Correctly specified logistic regression models performed quite well with low bias while misspecified logistic regression models that were missing important interactions and non-linearities in pre-treatment covariates produced high bias.
Despite few outcomes, our models performed quite well.
Similar(53)
Measured solar radiation for Bogra is available only for a year though, the figure clearly shows that the sample models perform quite well.
It is first shown that even at relatively low frequencies, the frequency domain models perform quite satisfactorily as compared to the exact time domain theory.
It has been suggested that the balance between signal and noise is relatively unfavourable in many medical applications, making relatively simple regression models perform quite reasonably [ 9].
The predicted beach water quality was validated against observed data after a heavy rainfall event using Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (E) and the overall result indicated that the model performed quite well and the simulation was in – good agreement with the observed E. coli concentrations for all beaches.
In the training group, this model performed quite well to predict CrCl, having a correlation with measured CrCl of R = 0.970 (p < 0.001), SEE = 8.7 mL/min/1.73 m, where the median difference was 7.4 mL/min/1.73 m, and IQR 16.4 mL/min/1.73 m (see Table 4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com