Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The two models performed differently on each database, so using either one to form the saliency map would not result in good performance.
A Wilcoxon signed rank test performed on the classification results returned by SMM and MMM for the test set gave a p-value < 5.1 × 10−94 (test statistics of 6.8 × 105), which indicated that the two models performed differently based on the dataset employed.
Furthermore, at a 0.05 significance level, a Wilcoxon signed rank test performed on the 5,656 paired label rank positions gave a p-value < 5.1 × 10−94 (test statistics of 6.8 × 105), which indicates that the two models performed differently with respect to the multi-label test dataset employed.
The two models performed differently when tested on four datasets comprising single-label (non-promiscuous) compounds; McNemar's test yielded χ 2 values of 15.657, 16.500 and 16.405 (with corresponding p-values of 7.594 × 10−05, 4.865 × 10−05 and 5.115 × 10−05), respectively, for three test sets, in favour of MMM.
As r increased, however, the three models performed differently.
Similar(54)
The basic design can be extended to explore whether models perform differently on different types of watershed; it is also shown how it can be adapted, through the use of "balanced incomplete blocks", to avoid the need to calibrate (and validate) every model on every watershed.
However, the models perform differently in the case that model parameters are transposed from the downstream catchments.
Physical modelling is performed differently by RSA-based systems, like HYMOSTRUC 3D, and by concurrent algorithm-based systems, like SPACE.
The five bucket models performed quite differently, which demonstrated the aspect ratio effects and inside-bucket compartment effects.
In this test, SVMRank performed differently for different targets in this strategy (Figure 4).
Our analysis included data from the hospitals operating under the centrally managed universal health system (Clalit Health Services), therefore it might be expected that the models will perform differently in other countries.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com