Exact(5)
In all statistical models, p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
For regression models, p values were obtained by using the Wald test; no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons.
Estimated slopes in boldface type in Tables 1 A (for anaemia) and 1B (for cachexia) differed significantly from zero in minimal models; P values appear in parentheses.
bC reactive protein (CRP) was forced in the multivariate models (p values for association with the risk of colorectal cancer were respectively of 0.58, 0.87, 0.60, 0.69 in the NGAL, NGAL/MMP-9, sTNFR-1 and sTNFR-2 models).
In these same Cox models, P values for trend in HRs according to total, intensity and duration of smoking are based on the Wald test of the linear contrast between the four categories compared (never smokers and the three categories of current smokers) [ 20].
Similar(55)
A linear trend was seen in all models (p value for the trend < 0.001 for all models).
We used the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons with a type 1 error rate of 0.05 and 24 models (p value set at 0.002).
ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the model (P values < 0.05).
Middle and bottom panels: a comparison between experimental and model P values for March 2008 and January 2016 Fig. 12 Correspondence time scales.
Full models were then reduced by sequentially deleting variables with model P values ≥0.10 to arrive at the final model.
The 11 presented variables were those included in the final logistic model p Values <0.2 are detailed.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com