Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
We implemented three steady-state models of leaf water δ18O and δ2H: one modeling the sites of evaporative enrichment inside leaves (based on the formulations of Craig & Gordon [22]; see http://isoscapes.org for detailed GIS and modeling descriptions) and two models of "bulk" leaf water δ18O and δ2H that take into account isotopic heterogeneity within leaves.
To capture the mechanical responses of a porous PP separator, its microstructure was mapped into separate atomistic models of bulk crystalline phases and oriented amorphous nanofibers.
Molecular simulation techniques have been applied to study the diffusion of oxygen and dioxide of carbon as small molecule penetrants in models of bulk amorphous poly ethylene terephthalate) and related aromatic polyesters.
Furthermore, a relationship is developed among the above three models of bulk compression, in which the above ratio is related to parameters such as the inter-particle and particle wall friction coefficients, initial porosity of the bed and lateral to axial pressure ratio of the particles in the bed.
We evaluated two alternative models of "bulk" leaf water that have been developed to explain this discrepancy.
The spatial patterns predicted by the Two-pool and Péclet models of bulk leaf water were similar to those shown for the sites of evaporation model (see Figure 2 for latitudinal trends in δ18O for all models).
Similar(54)
Figure 5a, b presents the ball and stick model of bulk Ni2P and the calculated band structure.
With a model of bulk density based on sand and organic matter contents as well as soil depth, bulk density values of these C-horizons were adapted.
A molecular dynamics model of bulk ZnO has also been constructed and simulated using periodic boundary conditions.
We propose a Haskell monadic model of bulk synchronous parallel programs and apply it to the analysis of relation-based computations.
Model of bulk MoS2 includes two layers of S-Mo-S sandwich, which consist of one Mo atom and two S atoms in each layer, as seen in Fig. 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com