We can only speculate but the structural characterization of the different models merits further attention because predictions are sufficient consistent to discreetly arguing the possibility of structural differences based on pattern 3 motifs.
We now turn our attention to three additional features of the model which merit further exploration.
This model shows sufficient promise to merit further rigorous testing and broader application.
Nevertheless, omission biases are not easily tractable in generalized linear models (Neuhaus and Jewell 1993) and certainly merit further investigation in this context.
Scientific and clinical studies in this model and in other long and complex multimodal regimens merit further investigation, in particular to address the duration of appropriate thromboprophylaxis.
The findings merit further analysis and exploration within a decision analytic model.
However, when considered in the context of cohesive barriers, our model also suggests that a surprisingly large number of candidate barriers exist and merit further study.
Young et al. [ 14] discuss different models of healthcare provision for ADHD transition and suggest that shared care arrangements between Primary and Secondary Care services merit further investigation.
