Now, you need to know that the difference between these models are minimal, so try to keep up.
From the H-D models it is evident that the Michaelis-Menten and power-law models are adequate, while the gain in explanatory power from the other models was minimal.
For the factor scores, the postnatal model provided the lowest Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion (best fit) for Tourette syndrome and Tourette syndrome/chronic tics, although the differences between these three derived-factor models were minimal.
In the placebo arm, the log-normal distribution provided the best fit for three subgroups, followed by the log-logistic distribution; however, differences in predicted survival times between the log-normal and log-logistic models were minimal.
The consequence of the model is minimal product differentiation resulting in limited pricing power and corresponding lack of revenue.
Contribution of the current change of pixel in the model is minimal and tailing effect of the previous object/background can be visible if we use very low α (e.g., 0.001).
A significant advantage is that the bagging overhead for our model is minimal, and no extra efforts are needed to handle the outputs of different tasks as done in those multi-lifespan models.
It is manifested further from the results that the HR determined by the error correction (EC) model is minimal and the hedging performances for both the out-of-sample and in-sample data are weak, yet the hedging effectiveness for both of them is stable.
Thus, our loop model is minimal meaning that we do not assume a priori long-range forces and active transport mechanisms.
