Tikunova and Davis (44) showed that cTnC mutants can bind Ca2+ with even faster second-order rate constants, which indicates that the mechanism of Ca2+ binding may be not purely diffusion-controlled. Nevertheless, introducing a linear dependence of kB on [Ca2+] relation in a model simulation gives close agreement with our data (see modeling chapter).
However, the IRI model gives closer probability of RSF occurrence to our observed values at CPN, especially in equinoctial months and during the periods of medium solar activity.
Both models give very close predictions, which reveal good correspondence with the experimental results.
In general, the two models give foF2 close to the experimental values, whereas significant discrepancies are found in the predictions of TEC from the models especially during the daytime.
All models give relatively close estimates for the number of genes in LUCA, around 500 genes, but the identities of genes that are confidently placed into LUCA are different under different models.
The resulting approach is shown to be able to predict the structural response of the multi-cell composite beams with a considerable degree of accuracy and comparisons between the theory and the results from finite element numerical modelling are shown to give close agreement.
Both presented models give results very close to this exact solution, for all laminates and all length-to-thickness ratios.
This means that for some samples, these models give a predicted mean close to the observed mean for those predicted to be in the top decile.
In the dynamic analysis, it is found that both analytical model and finite element modeling give very close results of the resonance frequency of the device.
Our study shows that: (1) In general, both the URSI and CCIR options of the IRI model give foF2 close to the measured ones, but the CCIR option produces a smaller range of deviation than the URSI option.
