Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
These two models gave very good results for the retrieval of leaf area index and aboveground biomass.
While there were large differences in model predictions for individual species, the models gave very similar qualitative results when ranking fishing policies and describing trade-offs.
Both models gave very similar kinetic, topological and grain size distribution results for grain growth and Ostwald ripening in spite of their different approaches.
Non linear probit and IV probit models gave very similar results that are available upon request.
The two theoretical models gave very comparable geometries. 1 is highly symmetric tetrahedral structure with all C C C 110.9o and the C C-H angle 108.0°.
Use of generalized linear mixed models gave very similar results.
Similar(47)
The finite element models give very good agreement with the experimental results and observations.
Both models give very close predictions, which reveal good correspondence with the experimental results.
The results show that the three models give very similar results in terms of mean value, but they could give very different responses if the exceedance day indicator is used.
Both the Korsunksy and Puchi-Cabrera models give very good fits to the data and predict film and substrate hardnesses that would be expected for this film/substrate system.
We can readily see from Fig. 7(a) that the two wind models give very similar results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com