Exact(1)
Theoretical explanatory models for sick leave behavior are scarce.
Similar(59)
It would be informative to develop separate prognostic models for workers without current sick leave, and those with longstanding or previous sick leave at presentation in order to assess whether the effects of potential predictors such as pain intensity or psychological problems differ in relevant subgroups.
In the explanatory models for pain, disability and sick leave, consistency scores were used as predictors.
The explanatory models for pain, disability and sick leave significantly predicted pain and disability at follow-up.
The predictive models for pain, disability and sick leave based on the consistency scores in the valued life domains showed that the models used for pain and disability had explanatory value.
The models for parameter 1 (number of sick leave days on the first sickness certificate), parameter 6 (duly completed certificates) and parameter 7 (acceptable certificates) were the strongest models, with an R of approximately 30%, while the model for parameter 2 (face-to-face contacts) had an R of 15.6%, which indicated relative strength.
In this article we have extended the model to include eight different categories for sick leave benefits or return to work.
Earlier work on multi-state models for Norwegian registry data on sick leave benefits has also been in the form of cohort follow-up studies [ 2, 3], but without using the detailed covariate information available in these cohorts.
For this, workers were grouped into quintiles according to their predicted probability for sick leave according to the model.
Including the attitude variables in the model of self-certified sick leave gives a larger percentage increase in R-square (a 36% increase, from 0.157 to 0.214) relative to including the attitude variables in the model for GP-certified sick leave (a 32% increase, from 0.133 to 0.176).
None of the illness perceptions significantly predicted benefit recipiency in the adjusted model for those on sick leave, while uncertain and negative RTW-expectations did.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com