Exact(11)
Predictive SV candidate models for epoch 2010 2015 Team Model Organization Data Comments (parent model etc).
Scalar residuals between the testing dataset and the seven main field candidate models for epoch 2005.0.
Models for epoch 2010.0 were submitted in October 2009; teams therefore faced the additional challenge of how to propagate their estimates forward to 2010.0; this was not an issue faced when deriving retrospective models for epoch 2005.0.
The derivation of the main magnetic field candidate models for epoch 2015.0 was more challenging than for epoch 2010.0.
Fig. 3. Scalar residuals between the testing dataset and the seven main field candidate models for epoch 2010.0.
Having completed the analysis of MF models for epoch 2005.0 we now move on to consider epoch 2010.0.
Similar(48)
Table 1 Comparison of different approximation models for epochs of EEG signals.
Candidate main field models for epochs 2005.0 and 2010.0 were tested against vector and scalar data from the CHAMP satellite.
Finally, the magnetospheric field was removed using two models for epochs 2005.0 and 2010.0 obtained by Thébault et al. (2010) while calculating their candidate main field models for those epochs.
This particular version consists of new models for epochs 2010 DGRF-20100) and 2015 IGRF-20155) as well as a predictive secular variation model for 2015 2020 (SV 2015 2020).
The final IGRF-12 MF models for epochs 2010.0 and 2015.0 as well as the predictive SV model for 2015.0-2020.0 were calculated using a new weighting scheme of the candidate models.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com