models for driver

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "models for driver" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It could be used in contexts discussing design or simulation models related to drivers, but it needs more context to be fully understandable. Example: "The research team developed several models for driver behavior analysis to improve road safety."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

She considered two models for driver behavior.

The New York Times

To develop biomechanical variable models for driver skull base injury mechanisms in motor vehicle collisions.

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Using the gathered data, statistical models for driver PRT and deceleration levels were developed, considering roadway surface and environmental parameters, driver attributes (age and gender), roadway grade, approaching speed, and time and distance to the intersection at the onset of yellow.

International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Finally, we select the 11 top-ranked features with rotation forest algorithm to build the model for driver mutations prediction.

BioMed Research International

"Since the founding, I knew that Zipcar would end up being the winning model for drivers, and that car rental companies would eventually have to come around and adopt our technology and approach," Ms. Chase said in an e-mail on Wednesday.

The New York Times

Another area where it's looking to shake things up is its commission model for drivers.

TechCrunch

The work presents a model for drivers with different preferences and link managers with different ad hoc price update policies.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Next, the mixed logit model for drivers' diversion decision behavior under VMS is developed and compared with the conventional cross-sectional logit model.

Journal of Modern Transportation

The difference between the top- and bottom-rated models for a driver's ability to see down a dark road was substantial, according to the study released Wednesday by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, an industry-funded organization that evaluates automotive safety.

Los Angeles Times

Each logistic regression model controlled for driver age (16 20 years, 21 34 years, 35 54 years, and 55 years or older), gender (female or male), race (white, black, or other), time of last marijuana use (beyond a year/never, over a month, within the past month to 2 days, or in the past 24 h), and blood alcohol concentration (BAC; 0 mg/dl, 1 39 mg/dl, and 40 or more mg/dl).

Injury Epidemiology

On newer electric and hybrid models, for example, drivers can see on the dashboard display exactly how many miles per gallon the vehicle is achieving.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For improved clarity and grammatical correctness, consider using the phrase "driver models" or "models of driver behavior" instead of "models for driver". This provides a more standard and easily understood phrasing, especially in academic or technical writing.

Common error

Avoid using "models for driver" as it is grammatically awkward. Instead, use "driver models" or "models of driver behavior" to clearly convey the intended meaning in your writing. The preposition "for" may imply that the models are intended to be used by drivers, which might not be the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "models for driver" functions as a noun phrase intended to describe simulations or analytical tools related to drivers or their behavior. However, its structure is grammatically questionable, as highlighted by Ludwig AI. A more appropriate structure would be "driver models".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "models for driver" is understandable, it's grammatically awkward and not considered best practice. As Ludwig AI points out, phrases like "driver models" or "models of driver behavior" are significantly clearer and more appropriate alternatives. The phrase appears mainly in scientific and news contexts, but its low frequency suggests that writers should opt for more standard constructions to ensure clarity and precision. Utilizing these improved phrases will make your writing more polished and professional.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

driver models

Reverses the word order for a more standard noun-adjective structure.

models of driver behavior

Adds 'behavior' for clarity, specifying what aspect of drivers is being modeled.

driver behavior models

A more direct and common phrasing for describing models related to driver behavior.

simulation models for drivers

Specifies that the models are for simulating drivers, clarifying the purpose.

computational models of drivers

Replaces models with "computational models" for more technical context.

agent-based models for drivers

Uses "agent-based models" for more detail in computer simulation.

predictive models of driver actions

Focuses on predicting actions, specifying the model's function.

driver profiling models

Focuses on profiling as a modeling approach.

mathematical models for drivers

Uses "mathematical models" to clarify the methodology.

stochastic models of driver behavior

Introduces the stochastic methodology in modeling driver behavior.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically sound alternative to "models for driver"?

The phrase "driver models" or "models of driver behavior" is a better alternative as it follows standard English grammar and is more easily understood.

How can I use "models for driver" in a sentence correctly?

While the phrase "models for driver" is grammatically awkward, it can be used when discussing models designed specifically for use by a driver. However, "driver models" or "models of driver behavior" is generally preferred.

What's the difference between "models for driver" and "driver models"?

"Driver models" is a more direct and grammatically correct way to refer to models that represent or simulate driver behavior. "Models for driver" could imply models designed to be used by drivers which is a less common meaning.

When is it appropriate to use "models for driver" over "driver models"?

It's rarely preferable to use "models for driver" due to its grammatical awkwardness. "Driver models" or "models of driver behavior" are almost always clearer and more appropriate.