Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
The other two models estimated a smaller number than the LN-Bayes model.
The models estimated a 10% decrease in Unbanded and a 5% increase in Mid-banded had taken place.
Both models estimated a small effect of short interpregnancy interval on small for gestational age birth.
Despite differences in performance among the three clock models, divergence time estimates among oomycetes were strikingly consistent (Table 3 and Additional file 2), and all models estimated a mid-Paleozoic origin for oomycetes.
Both the unmatched and matched models estimated a high odds of small for gestational age birth and low birth weight for long interpregnancy intervals (longer than 59 months), but the estimated effect of long interpregnancy intervals on the odds of preterm birth was much weaker in the matched model than in the unmatched model.
Regression models (weighted) were used, and the models estimated a non-significant decrease in all-cause mortality rate over a period of 10 years to be −0.78 (95% CI, −2.66 to 1.09, P = 0.362) and a significant decrease in the vascular mortality rate over a period of 10 years to be −1.60 (95% CI, −2.77 to −0.44, P = 0.013).
Similar(53)
The relaxed clock models estimated an uncorrelated standard deviation of the mutation rate (ucld.stdev) abutting zero, providing evidence for a strict rather than relaxed molecular clock.
Sensitivity analyses using Bayesian models estimated an even lower risk of complications (pneumothorax: 1.3%, 95% credible interval 0.2% to 3.3%; hemothorax 0.5%, 95% credible interval 0%to1.2%2%).
However, both WB-PES Qand TOSQA-2001 modestimatemate a relatively low value.
In contrast, formative measurement models estimate a latent variable, applying a set of indicators, which are assumed to cause the construct [29].
In the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects instrumental variable models estimate a local average treatment (LATE) for those individuals who comply with the IVs (Imbens and Angrist 1994).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com