Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Since different community query models differ in their objective goodness functions (such as degree, density, and diameter), an uniform quantitive quality evaluation is beyond this paper's scope.
These models differ in their applicability on different types of terrain and different environmental conditions.
Current theoretical bearing models differ in their stiffness estimates because of different model assumptions.
Besides differences in cell types, in vitro lung barrier models differ in whether they are submerged or cultured at the air liquid interface.
The two models differ in screen and in price.
The models differ in their energy equations.
The estimated choice models differ in preference and scale parameters.
The models differ in how to estimate and correct for biases specific to each pollster – so-called "house effects".
The two T-MPSOM models differ in the procedure employed to calculate the neural activation.
These models differ in solid phase modelling, which allows to evaluate the reactor dynamic behaviour prediction capacity.
Although the models differ in their approach, we find that they predict surprisingly similar responses to sea-level change.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com